Amendment VII: Civil Case Jury Right
Posted: Fri May 29, 2026 9:18 am
My other cases having so far been overcome by the mere POWER of the State of Michigan and the Federal Courts (logic and law were not used by them) I filed a Citizen of a State vs said State against Michigan directly in the U.S. Supreme Court on State violation of U.S. Constitution Amendment VII grounds. An assistant to the Clerk rejected the filing (i.e., it never made it to a Justice and probably not even their clerks) on Hans v. Louisiana grounds. As you'll see in the attachments a review of Hans clearly shows that Hans provides no basis whatsoever for rejecting my filed motion which is in complete compliance with the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States and properly cites the U.S. Constitution.
This case, after a retry with filing, was then provided, again following the Rules (22 specifically), to my 6th Circuit Justice, Bret Kavanaugh, who to date (5/28/2026) has not responded. Therefore, since the Supreme Court Clerk has returned my Motion copies, I have (perhaps prematurely) assumed DENIED as the Kavanaugh response and filed a "renewed application" with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The attachment to this post provides copies of the original Motion, the Hans review, and other correspondence with the Supreme Court up to the point of the filing with Justice Jackson.
This case, after a retry with filing, was then provided, again following the Rules (22 specifically), to my 6th Circuit Justice, Bret Kavanaugh, who to date (5/28/2026) has not responded. Therefore, since the Supreme Court Clerk has returned my Motion copies, I have (perhaps prematurely) assumed DENIED as the Kavanaugh response and filed a "renewed application" with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The attachment to this post provides copies of the original Motion, the Hans review, and other correspondence with the Supreme Court up to the point of the filing with Justice Jackson.