Search found 46 matches
- Mon Jul 14, 2025 12:21 pm
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: My Case(s)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 45178
Re: My Case(s): Layoff Law Violation (Part IV)
https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lo4nug2zhk2q My questions to the US Supreme Court and their Dockett. https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lo4qgon2lc2q My Questions on Reconsideration to the US Supreme Court and Blackstone notes on law understanding. ...
- Mon Jul 14, 2025 12:08 pm
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: My Case(s)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 45178
Re: My Case(s): Layoff Law Violation (Part III)
https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3llron2s6fc2o My reconsideration request to the 30th Circuit Court. https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lltxkdxka22m The 30th Circuit Court reconsideration denial (not even for the correct case!) https://bsky.app/profi...
- Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:42 am
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: My Case(s)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 45178
Re: My Case(s): Layoff Law Violation (Part II)
https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lk6xo64fq22s My response to ALJ showing "However..." sentence, etc. https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lkeax2o3cs2p The ALJ response again ignoring "However..." and my appeal filing. https://bsky....
- Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:10 am
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: My Case(s)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 45178
Re: My Case(s): Layoff Law Violation (Part I)
The following links are in order to my posts on Bluesky that show the basic documentation of my layoff case in which the courts and administrative agencies have very clearly exercised POWER to reject justice, the law, and even the Constitution. https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/po...
- Fri May 30, 2025 1:03 pm
- Forum: Globalization
- Topic: Globalization
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2485
Globalization
Globalization will not and cannot go away. Why not? For the simple reason that mineable and other exploitable resources are not geographically even across all countries. Just like you don't have a goldmine in your back yard (if you have a back yard). Additionally, within reason and within reasonable...
- Tue Mar 11, 2025 2:49 pm
- Forum: Stare decisis (AKA precedent)
- Topic: Hans v. Louisiana (Sue a State Constitutionally)
- Replies: 0
- Views: 68196
Hans v. Louisiana (Sue a State Constitutionally)
The "Conclusion," best seen via the attached PDF, is that the Supreme Court in using Hans v. Louisiana to deny its own "original Jurisdiction" (U.S. Const., Art. III, Sec. 2, Cl. 2) in cases brought against a State that is violating the Constitution (and/or Federal law or treatie...
- Thu Mar 06, 2025 7:57 pm
- Forum: The Proposals, Etc.
- Topic: Congressional Action Needed
- Replies: 0
- Views: 65243
Congressional Action Needed
Dear Congressperson, It has come to my attention that CONGRESS can and MUST take over the Presidential and Judicial POWERS. The following parts of the Constitution make that POWER clear. You may need to work to convince some Republicans but the gain will be worth it. Also, please pass this on to the...
- Sun Dec 01, 2024 1:17 pm
- Forum: The Proposals, Etc.
- Topic: Remove Donald J. Trump's Disability for the Office of President
- Replies: 1
- Views: 60208
Without Removal; Then What?
The Constitution has an answer already: Amendment XX, 3: If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of hi...
- Wed Nov 20, 2024 12:09 pm
- Forum: The Proposals, Etc.
- Topic: Remove Donald J. Trump's Disability for the Office of President
- Replies: 1
- Views: 60208
Remove Donald J. Trump's Disability for the Office of President
“But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.” U.S. Constitution Amendment XIV And yet: "responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the States" [ my emphasis ]) Above from Donald J. Trum...
- Mon Nov 18, 2024 3:06 pm
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: $5,000 Reward
- Replies: 0
- Views: 75167
$5,000 Reward
First let me state I don't expect anyone to be able to collect this $5,000 reward. The only reason the State of Michigan has so far been able to keep the money due me is because they have the POWER to do so whether they are right or not. The whole lawyer and judicial system of Michigan and the Unite...
- Wed Oct 30, 2024 9:23 am
- Forum: The Proposals, Etc.
- Topic: Vote Non-Politician
- Replies: 0
- Views: 48980
Vote Non-Politician
I get it. I'm with you. I don't want to see politicians (in the pejorative self-interested sense) running things. Write in "James E. White, Okemos" for President and your pick of non-politicians for VP. And especially do so if you're mistakenly thinking that Donald J. Trump is a non-politi...
- Tue Oct 29, 2024 2:48 pm
- Forum: The Proposals, Etc.
- Topic: Fix Congress to Start Fixing Courts
- Replies: 0
- Views: 46354
Fix Congress to Start Fixing Courts
First, the main thrust of this website is that "We the People" need to get the judiciary of the USA back under control. Currently many of its members pay little attention to either the laws or the Federal and State constitutions (at least here in Michigan). This site will take you through ...
- Tue Sep 24, 2024 2:02 pm
- Forum: Stare decisis (AKA precedent)
- Topic: Stare decisis
- Replies: 1
- Views: 60462
Re: Stare decisis
The former judge referred to above replied "I can certainly imagine a system in which the lower federal courts, are free to disregard Supreme Court decisions with which they disagree, but that isn’t the system we have. Our system promotes stability and ensures that only the Supreme Court can ov...
- Tue Sep 24, 2024 1:41 pm
- Forum: Stare decisis (AKA precedent)
- Topic: Stare decisis
- Replies: 1
- Views: 60462
Stare decisis
Lawyers have been bamboozled. Ask yourself this hypothetical. If the Supreme Court said that 1+2=4 should all lawyers insist that their grocer accept that arithmetic? And yet if the Supreme Court had said that, by the rules they think they must obey judges would enforce 1+2=4 if anyone presented in ...
- Tue Sep 24, 2024 11:39 am
- Forum: Civil Juries? You Wish.
- Topic: USA Founders Thoughts
- Replies: 1
- Views: 94796
Re: USA Founders Thoughts
While Alexander Hamilton's first sentence quoted from Federalist No. 83 has some ambiguity it appears that further consideration as he was writing his commentary led him to side with the benefits of civil juries and their ability to provide a check on not only bribery of the judiciary but the judici...
- Tue Sep 24, 2024 11:28 am
- Forum: Civil Juries? You Wish.
- Topic: USA Founders Thoughts
- Replies: 1
- Views: 94796
USA Founders Thoughts
Alexander Hamilton, who actively participated in the creation of the U.S. Constitution, had the following thoughts regarding how States, and other government subdivisions, might treat controlling powers and, in particular, why civil juries could and should provide a check on judicial abuse of power....
- Tue Sep 24, 2024 11:13 am
- Forum: Rights vs. Rules?
- Topic: Law Decision Hierarchy
- Replies: 0
- Views: 75308
Law Decision Hierarchy
Below is what I suggest is the correct law decision hierarchy where the higher levels always trump the lower levels. Too many judges these days seem to make every effort to demonstrate their POWER by applying the lowest level rules possible to award a winner. The hierarchy of the law overriding from...
- Tue Sep 24, 2024 10:40 am
- Forum: Civil Juries? You Wish.
- Topic: Suggest Civil Cases
- Replies: 0
- Views: 46266
Suggest Civil Cases
Before suggesting a civil case in which you believe that fundamental law (right or statute) is clearly overridden by the judiciary please be sure that you can provide the correct law cite. Also it is best if it was a bench trial (judge only), a trial where a jury was requested but decided without on...
- Tue Sep 24, 2024 10:32 am
- Forum: Civil Juries? You Wish.
- Topic: Michigan Ignores Amendment VII
- Replies: 0
- Views: 48454
Michigan Ignores Amendment VII
U.S. Const. Art. III, § 2 (Appendix F 1 ): 1. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution … 2. In all Cases … in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. U.S. Const. Art. VI (Appendix G): 2. This Constituti...
- Mon Sep 02, 2024 3:10 pm
- Forum: Amendment IX
- Topic: What rights should Amendment IX protect?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 73584
What rights should Amendment IX protect?
Vote for the rights you think should be included in Amendment IX.
Click "Post Reply" and enter a right suggestion that you think is or should be included. James E. White may reword them if needed and (eventually) add them to the poll to allow you to vote for all you are interested in.
Click "Post Reply" and enter a right suggestion that you think is or should be included. James E. White may reword them if needed and (eventually) add them to the poll to allow you to vote for all you are interested in.