USAreset.net/forum

Globalization will not and cannot go away. Why not? For the simple reason that mineable and other exploitable resources are not geographically even across all countries. Just like you don't have a goldmine in your back yard (if you have a back yard). Additionally, within reason and within reasonable...

The "Conclusion," best seen via the attached PDF, is that the Supreme Court in using Hans v. Louisiana to deny its own "original Jurisdiction" (U.S. Const., Art. III, Sec. 2, Cl. 2) in cases brought against a State that is violating the Constitution (and/or Federal law or treatie...

Dear Congressperson, It has come to my attention that CONGRESS can and MUST take over the Presidential and Judicial POWERS. The following parts of the Constitution make that POWER clear. You may need to work to convince some Republicans but the gain will be worth it. Also, please pass this on to the...

The Constitution has an answer already: Amendment XX, 3: If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of hi...

“But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.” U.S. Constitution Amendment XIV And yet: "responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the States" [ my emphasis ]) Above from Donald J. Trum...

First let me state I don't expect anyone to be able to collect this $5,000 reward. The only reason the State of Michigan has so far been able to keep the money due me is because they have the POWER to do so whether they are right or not. The whole lawyer and judicial system of Michigan and the Unite...

I get it. I'm with you. I don't want to see politicians (in the pejorative self-interested sense) running things. Write in "James E. White, Okemos" for President and your pick of non-politicians for VP. And especially do so if you're mistakenly thinking that Donald J. Trump is a non-politi...

First, the main thrust of this website is that "We the People" need to get the judiciary of the USA back under control. Currently many of its members pay little attention to either the laws or the Federal and State constitutions (at least here in Michigan). This site will take you through ...

The former judge referred to above replied "I can certainly imagine a system in which the lower federal courts, are free to disregard Supreme Court decisions with which they disagree, but that isn’t the system we have. Our system promotes stability and ensures that only the Supreme Court can ov...

Lawyers have been bamboozled. Ask yourself this hypothetical. If the Supreme Court said that 1+2=4 should all lawyers insist that their grocer accept that arithmetic? And yet if the Supreme Court had said that, by the rules they think they must obey judges would enforce 1+2=4 if anyone presented in ...

While Alexander Hamilton's first sentence quoted from Federalist No. 83 has some ambiguity it appears that further consideration as he was writing his commentary led him to side with the benefits of civil juries and their ability to provide a check on not only bribery of the judiciary but the judici...

Alexander Hamilton, who actively participated in the creation of the U.S. Constitution, had the following thoughts regarding how States, and other government subdivisions, might treat controlling powers and, in particular, why civil juries could and should provide a check on judicial abuse of power....

Below is what I suggest is the correct law decision hierarchy where the higher levels always trump the lower levels. Too many judges these days seem to make every effort to demonstrate their POWER by applying the lowest level rules possible to award a winner. The hierarchy of the law overriding from...

Before suggesting a civil case in which you believe that fundamental law (right or statute) is clearly overridden by the judiciary please be sure that you can provide the correct law cite. Also it is best if it was a bench trial (judge only), a trial where a jury was requested but decided without on...

U.S. Const. Art. III, § 2 (Appendix F 1 ): 1. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution … 2. In all Cases … in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. U.S. Const. Art. VI (Appendix G): 2. This Constituti...

Vote for the rights you think should be included in Amendment IX.

Click "Post Reply" and enter a right suggestion that you think is or should be included. James E. White may reword them if needed and (eventually) add them to the poll to allow you to vote for all you are interested in.

Thanks for reading through my thoughts and facts. Hopefully you were able to follow the logic but if you have questions don't hesitate to ask me at jim at this website domain name or even better "Post Reply" directly to the relevant topic and add your discussion too. I also need help creat...

Yes, it is all very complex. No, I cannot tell you what is the best answer for you or for all. You must engage your brain, gather the facts (the actual facts sorting the wheat from the well-presented, deliberate chaff), reason from them to what appears workable to you, actively engage in discussion ...

Everybody wants to be safe. But too many people want "the government" somehow to provide that safety. It can't. You can't. Nobody can. There is always danger from natural disasters big and small, bad actors from drunk drivers to scammers, killers, and other lesser or more amoral people, an...

Can you tell an Artificial Intelligence image or article or whatever from one produced by actual humans? I propose that Congress create laws that it be mandatory that all AI produced stuff be clearly labeled as such and that the provider cannot enforce any kind of disclaimer at all. Further I propos...