Search found 51 matches
- Mon Jan 05, 2026 12:44 pm
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: My Case(s)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 54584
Re: My Case(s): Notice to U.S. Supreme Court of Petition to U.S. Senate
January 5, 2026 Scott S. Harris U.S. Supreme Court Clerk 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543 Via sharris@supremecourt.gov Dear Clerk Harris: Two things. First, On March 6, 2025 I filed a Supreme Court Rule 22 request to Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh regarding a filing of a case against the State of...
- Mon Dec 22, 2025 3:55 pm
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: My Case(s)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 54584
Re: My Case(s): Petition to U.S. Senate (Cover Letter + Petition File)
December 22, 2025 Senator Gary Peters 51111 Woodward Ave, Suite 725 Pontiac, MI 48342 Dear Senator Peters, today (12/22/25) I sent to you at your Pontiac office a Petition for a redress of specific grievances against the United States. In particular the Supreme Court, House of Representatives, and E...
- Mon Nov 24, 2025 1:17 pm
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: My Case(s)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 54584
Re: My Case(s): Appeal to U.S. Senate (notice)
Dear Senator Whitehouse: I appreciate your efforts on the Bivens Act and the Constitutional Accountability Act but I don’t believe they are necessary simply because often what the Supreme Court has been teaching re the Constitution is INTENTIONALLY an unConstitutional POWER play on their part. The C...
- Wed Oct 08, 2025 10:15 am
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: My Case(s)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 54584
Re: My Case(s): Taking SCOTUS to Court, Appeal Stage
The below attachments are the key documents in my appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in taking SCOTUS to court for its own failure to adhere to the Constitution. Specifically it is an "error correcting court" per at least Amendment IX if not its "Judici...
- Tue Sep 09, 2025 10:59 am
- Forum: The USA *is* Great
- Topic: The USA *Is* Great
- Replies: 1
- Views: 167443
- Mon Jul 14, 2025 12:21 pm
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: My Case(s)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 54584
Re: My Case(s): Layoff Law Violation (Part IV)
https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lo4nug2zhk2q My questions to the US Supreme Court and their Dockett. https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lo4qgon2lc2q My Questions on Reconsideration to the US Supreme Court and Blackstone notes on law understanding. ...
- Mon Jul 14, 2025 12:08 pm
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: My Case(s)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 54584
Re: My Case(s): Layoff Law Violation (Part III)
https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3llron2s6fc2o My reconsideration request to the 30th Circuit Court. https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lltxkdxka22m The 30th Circuit Court reconsideration denial (not even for the correct case!) https://bsky.app/profi...
- Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:42 am
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: My Case(s)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 54584
Re: My Case(s): Layoff Law Violation (Part II)
https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lk6xo64fq22s My response to ALJ showing "However..." sentence, etc. https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lkeax2o3cs2p The ALJ response again ignoring "However..." and my appeal filing. https://bsky....
- Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:10 am
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: My Case(s)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 54584
Re: My Case(s): Layoff Law Violation (Part I)
The following links are in order to my posts on Bluesky that show the basic documentation of my layoff case in which the courts and administrative agencies have very clearly exercised POWER to reject justice, the law, and even the Constitution. https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/po...
- Fri May 30, 2025 1:03 pm
- Forum: Globalization
- Topic: Globalization
- Replies: 0
- Views: 10958
Globalization
Globalization will not and cannot go away. Why not? For the simple reason that mineable and other exploitable resources are not geographically even across all countries. Just like you don't have a goldmine in your back yard (if you have a back yard). Additionally, within reason and within reasonable...
- Tue Mar 11, 2025 2:49 pm
- Forum: Stare decisis (AKA precedent)
- Topic: Hans v. Louisiana (Sue a State Constitutionally)
- Replies: 0
- Views: 80795
Hans v. Louisiana (Sue a State Constitutionally)
The "Conclusion," best seen via the attached PDF, is that the Supreme Court in using Hans v. Louisiana to deny its own "original Jurisdiction" (U.S. Const., Art. III, Sec. 2, Cl. 2) in cases brought against a State that is violating the Constitution (and/or Federal law or treatie...
- Thu Mar 06, 2025 7:57 pm
- Forum: The Proposals, Etc.
- Topic: Congressional Action Needed
- Replies: 0
- Views: 76464
Congressional Action Needed
Dear Congressperson, It has come to my attention that CONGRESS can and MUST take over the Presidential and Judicial POWERS. The following parts of the Constitution make that POWER clear. You may need to work to convince some Republicans but the gain will be worth it. Also, please pass this on to the...
- Sun Dec 01, 2024 1:17 pm
- Forum: The Proposals, Etc.
- Topic: Remove Donald J. Trump's Disability for the Office of President
- Replies: 1
- Views: 70518
Without Removal; Then What?
The Constitution has an answer already: Amendment XX, 3: If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of hi...
- Wed Nov 20, 2024 12:09 pm
- Forum: The Proposals, Etc.
- Topic: Remove Donald J. Trump's Disability for the Office of President
- Replies: 1
- Views: 70518
Remove Donald J. Trump's Disability for the Office of President
“But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.” U.S. Constitution Amendment XIV And yet: "responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the States" [ my emphasis ]) Above from Donald J. Trum...
- Mon Nov 18, 2024 3:06 pm
- Forum: My Case
- Topic: $5,000 Reward
- Replies: 0
- Views: 81816
$5,000 Reward
First let me state I don't expect anyone to be able to collect this $5,000 reward. The only reason the State of Michigan has so far been able to keep the money due me is because they have the POWER to do so whether they are right or not. The whole lawyer and judicial system of Michigan and the Unite...
- Wed Oct 30, 2024 9:23 am
- Forum: The Proposals, Etc.
- Topic: Vote Non-Politician
- Replies: 0
- Views: 59046
Vote Non-Politician
I get it. I'm with you. I don't want to see politicians (in the pejorative self-interested sense) running things. Write in "James E. White, Okemos" for President and your pick of non-politicians for VP. And especially do so if you're mistakenly thinking that Donald J. Trump is a non-politi...
- Tue Oct 29, 2024 2:48 pm
- Forum: The Proposals, Etc.
- Topic: Fix Congress to Start Fixing Courts
- Replies: 0
- Views: 56072
Fix Congress to Start Fixing Courts
First, the main thrust of this website is that "We the People" need to get the judiciary of the USA back under control. Currently many of its members pay little attention to either the laws or the Federal and State constitutions (at least here in Michigan). This site will take you through ...
- Tue Sep 24, 2024 2:02 pm
- Forum: Stare decisis (AKA precedent)
- Topic: Stare decisis
- Replies: 1
- Views: 69223
Re: Stare decisis
The former judge referred to above replied "I can certainly imagine a system in which the lower federal courts, are free to disregard Supreme Court decisions with which they disagree, but that isn’t the system we have. Our system promotes stability and ensures that only the Supreme Court can ov...
- Tue Sep 24, 2024 1:41 pm
- Forum: Stare decisis (AKA precedent)
- Topic: Stare decisis
- Replies: 1
- Views: 69223
Stare decisis
Lawyers have been bamboozled. Ask yourself this hypothetical. If the Supreme Court said that 1+2=4 should all lawyers insist that their grocer accept that arithmetic? And yet if the Supreme Court had said that, by the rules they think they must obey judges would enforce 1+2=4 if anyone presented in ...
- Tue Sep 24, 2024 11:39 am
- Forum: Civil Juries? You Wish.
- Topic: USA Founders Thoughts
- Replies: 1
- Views: 112001
Re: USA Founders Thoughts
While Alexander Hamilton's first sentence quoted from Federalist No. 83 has some ambiguity it appears that further consideration as he was writing his commentary led him to side with the benefits of civil juries and their ability to provide a check on not only bribery of the judiciary but the judici...