USAreset.net/forum

Dear Senator Whitehouse: I appreciate your efforts on the Bivens Act and the Constitutional Accountability Act but I don’t believe they are necessary simply because often what the Supreme Court has been teaching re the Constitution is INTENTIONALLY an unConstitutional POWER play on their part. The C...

The below attachments are the key documents in my appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in taking SCOTUS to court for its own failure to adhere to the Constitution. Specifically it is an "error correcting court" per at least Amendment IX if not its "Judici...

See particularly https://contrarian.substack.com/p/democ ... ly-america

https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lo4nug2zhk2q My questions to the US Supreme Court and their Dockett. https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lo4qgon2lc2q My Questions on Reconsideration to the US Supreme Court and Blackstone notes on law understanding. ...

https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3llron2s6fc2o My reconsideration request to the 30th Circuit Court. https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lltxkdxka22m The 30th Circuit Court reconsideration denial (not even for the correct case!) https://bsky.app/profi...

https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lk6xo64fq22s My response to ALJ showing "However..." sentence, etc. https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/post/3lkeax2o3cs2p The ALJ response again ignoring "However..." and my appeal filing. https://bsky....

The following links are in order to my posts on Bluesky that show the basic documentation of my layoff case in which the courts and administrative agencies have very clearly exercised POWER to reject justice, the law, and even the Constitution. https://bsky.app/profile/jim-at-usareset.bsky.social/po...

Globalization will not and cannot go away. Why not? For the simple reason that mineable and other exploitable resources are not geographically even across all countries. Just like you don't have a goldmine in your back yard (if you have a back yard). Additionally, within reason and within reasonable...

The "Conclusion," best seen via the attached PDF, is that the Supreme Court in using Hans v. Louisiana to deny its own "original Jurisdiction" (U.S. Const., Art. III, Sec. 2, Cl. 2) in cases brought against a State that is violating the Constitution (and/or Federal law or treatie...

Dear Congressperson, It has come to my attention that CONGRESS can and MUST take over the Presidential and Judicial POWERS. The following parts of the Constitution make that POWER clear. You may need to work to convince some Republicans but the gain will be worth it. Also, please pass this on to the...

The Constitution has an answer already: Amendment XX, 3: If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of hi...

“But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.” U.S. Constitution Amendment XIV And yet: "responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the States" [ my emphasis ]) Above from Donald J. Trum...

First let me state I don't expect anyone to be able to collect this $5,000 reward. The only reason the State of Michigan has so far been able to keep the money due me is because they have the POWER to do so whether they are right or not. The whole lawyer and judicial system of Michigan and the Unite...

I get it. I'm with you. I don't want to see politicians (in the pejorative self-interested sense) running things. Write in "James E. White, Okemos" for President and your pick of non-politicians for VP. And especially do so if you're mistakenly thinking that Donald J. Trump is a non-politi...

First, the main thrust of this website is that "We the People" need to get the judiciary of the USA back under control. Currently many of its members pay little attention to either the laws or the Federal and State constitutions (at least here in Michigan). This site will take you through ...

The former judge referred to above replied "I can certainly imagine a system in which the lower federal courts, are free to disregard Supreme Court decisions with which they disagree, but that isn’t the system we have. Our system promotes stability and ensures that only the Supreme Court can ov...

Lawyers have been bamboozled. Ask yourself this hypothetical. If the Supreme Court said that 1+2=4 should all lawyers insist that their grocer accept that arithmetic? And yet if the Supreme Court had said that, by the rules they think they must obey judges would enforce 1+2=4 if anyone presented in ...

While Alexander Hamilton's first sentence quoted from Federalist No. 83 has some ambiguity it appears that further consideration as he was writing his commentary led him to side with the benefits of civil juries and their ability to provide a check on not only bribery of the judiciary but the judici...

Alexander Hamilton, who actively participated in the creation of the U.S. Constitution, had the following thoughts regarding how States, and other government subdivisions, might treat controlling powers and, in particular, why civil juries could and should provide a check on judicial abuse of power....

Below is what I suggest is the correct law decision hierarchy where the higher levels always trump the lower levels. Too many judges these days seem to make every effort to demonstrate their POWER by applying the lowest level rules possible to award a winner. The hierarchy of the law overriding from...